You Have Questions.  The Bible Has Answers.
Why does books of Matthew and Luke have differing accounts of Jesus' birth?

The books of Matthew and Luke have differing accounts
of Jesus' birth? Which one is correct?
Print This Page Print Page

Q. According to Matthew, Jesus was born in a house in Bethlehem (Matthew 2:11). They immediately left in a panic to Egypt because an angel told them that Herod was going to try to kill Jesus (Matthew 2:13). Afterwards, they are going to return to Bethlehem, but decide to go to Nazareth instead to avoid danger (Matthew 2:22-23).

But . . . According to Luke, Mary and Joseph were from Nazareth and went to Bethlehem only for a census (Luke 2:4). Instead of being born in a house, Jesus was born in a manger because there was no room in an Inn (Luke 2:7). After the birth, they waited only for Mary to go through ritual purification, whereupon they went to Jerusalem to sacrifice two birds (Luke 2:22-24). After that, they went immediately home to Nazareth (Luke 2:39). Which record is correct?

(Submitted by: Charles)

A. As concerning your question about the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem and the seeming discrepancy between the accounts in Matthew and Luke, you asked which is the correct account. As always in the Bible, both accounts are correct because they speak of two different time periods. The Luke account is the actual event of Christ's birth in the manger (Luke 2:1-39) .

The sequence is as follows: Mary completed nine months of pregnancy and gave birth to Jesus in a manger (Luke 2:6), because there was no room in the Inn (verse 7). The shepherds were told by an angel (no star or wise men) to go to the birth with Mary and Joseph present (verse 16).

The shepherds came and saw Christ's birth and left rejoicing. On the eighth day, Jesus was circumcised, and after 40 days as the Law required (Leviticus 12:1-8), they left for Jerusalem to make an offering for the birth of Christ. After that, they returned to Galilee to their own city, Nazareth (Luke 2:39). This completes the actual birth of Christ. No wisemen there.

About a year or so later, Mary and Joseph were back in Bethlehem to complete the census. Notice Matthew 2:1. Jesus was already born. The wise men were led by a star, and they came to Herod, the king. Herod asked them what time did the star appear? It took them, from the actual birth of Christ in Luke 2, over a year before the wise men got to Herod (A totally different time period from the birth of Jesus). The wise men were not present at Christ's birth as pictures of Christmas contend.

Continuing the account: Herod told the wise men to notify him after they saw Jesus because he too wanted to worship Him. The star was still shining, and brought the wise men to Jesus who at this time was a young child and living in a house (Matthew 2:11). At the time of their meeting Mary was there with Jesus, but not Joseph (like he was at Jesus' birth in the manger) (Luke 2). After the wise men saw the young child Jesus (not a new baby), they gave him presents and departed another way and did not tell Herod.

At this point Joseph was told by an angel to go to Egypt until Herod died. Herod got angry and killed all children under two years old (verse 16) because he knew Jesus was already a young child and not a baby.

After Egypt, Joseph, Mary and Jesus went to Nazareth because Herod was dead. From there the life of Jesus resumes in Luke 2:40.

From this we can see that the scriptures talk about two separate events: One that discusses the birth of Jesus in the manger and the other two years later when Jesus is visited by the wise men with their gifts.

Other Recommended Bible Study Materials:

Answer Given By: Art Mokarow




 
 
 
Visit the BEST Web Sites!
 
 
 

THE Bible Study Web Site at BibleStudy.org
You Have Questions.  The Bible Has Answers.