You Have Questions.  The Bible Has Answers.

Were seven books from the original
Hebrew Bible left out of the King James Bible?


Were seven books from the original
Hebrew Bible left out of the King James Bible?

 

Q. Were seven (7) books from the original Hebrew version of the Bible left OUT of King James Version Bible?

(Submitted by: Paul)

A. I do not think that books were left out from the Hebrew version but rather books were split and used in King James. For instance in the Hebrew versions the book of Kings is one book as is the book of Chronicles eliminating two books that are in the King James Version. The book of Samuel has also been split out into First and Second books in the King James Version. Some of the prophets were combined into one book which would include all the minor prophets from Amos to Malachi in the King James Version. Rest assured though all of the characters have been accounted for and that is what is most important.

Mordakhai Joseph, who does an excellent study of the Old Testament ( www.teachingthelaw.org), reads from a Hebrew to English Bible. I've noticed in his audio lessons that his Bible does not always follow the same chapter or verse patterns as my King James Version. He has to keep giving us updated references so we can read along and not get confused. So I suspect that the language syntax of the Hebrews has something to do with it as well. Hebrew is written from right to left and in all capital characters which might make an exact match impossible as English takes up several words or sentences to explain the same meaning.

It was not in the original manuscript to even have chapter and verses designated. That came much later when men copied them and added it for clarity and to know which lines they were on. In the original Masoretic manuscript each Hebrew character has a number designation and each word and line must add up to a certain original sum or the whole copy was thrown out. This is how we know that the original Hebrew has been copied correctly for thousands of years.

There are not only differences in the number of books but also in the sequencing of them. We know that in the New Testament Greek the Pauline epistles should follow the general epistles of James, Peter, John and Jude but they are reversed in the King James Version. And in the Old Testament we know that Ezra, Nehemiah and Chronicles were the last books written in historical sequence yet in the King James Version they are placed in the first third of the whole Old Testament which confused me until I understood this and labeled them in the right order of sequence.

Answer Given By: Charlotte Grantham

Bible Study Tips


 
 
 
Visit the BEST Web Sites!
 
 
 

THE Bible Study Web Site at BibleStudy.org
You Have Questions.  The Bible Has Answers.