ANSWER: The modern version of snake (serpent) handling began as a religious ritual in the Appalachia region of the U.S. by George Hensley. He introduced the practice, based on a literal interpretation of Mark 16:17 - 18, to a Holiness movement church around 1910. Hensley became a credentialed minister of the church in 1915. After seven years of service, he left the denomination that credentialed him to form the first Pentecostal church to require ALL its members to be able to handle a snake as proof of their conversion.
Those who practice snake handling as a religious ritual believe Mark 16:18 should be interpreted literally. They view the verse as a promise from Jesus that serpents will not harm them (especially during the worship of God) because they are Christians.
One of the main problems with this Biblical understanding is that the tragic history of using a poisonous snake as part of the worship of almighty God contradicts the validity of their interpretation.
Many people have DIED while handling these venomous reptiles in a church meeting or service. George Hensley, the "father' of this practice, died from a poisonous bite in 1955. In 1998, an 'evangelist' who used serpents during services died from a timber rattlesnake bite. His wife had died from a bite three years earlier.
In 2012, a pastor in the Pentecostal movement passed away after receiving a bite from a snake while leading an outdoor service.
In early 2014, a man named Jamie Coots, made famous through a popular cable TV show called 'Snake Salvation,' died from a poisonous bite. A Discovery Channel News article about his death stated those who have passed away from bites received while worshipping God likely number in the hundreds.
Mark 16 (and to a lesser extent Luke 10:19) are the only places in Scripture used to justify the handling of poisonous snakes. Jesus spoke the two verses referenced in Mark as part of his final instructions to his disciples (known as "the Great Commission") before his ascension (Mark 16:15 - 18).
After Jesus gave his disciples the authority to preach the gospel and baptize (verses 15 - 16) he states in verse 17 that "these signs shall follow those who believe." Among the signs was the inability to be harmed by a snake or poisons, and the gift of healing the sick.
Taking Mark 16:18 as the sole "proof text" that guarantees snake handling will not harm Christians, regardless of the circumstances, goes against sound Scriptural teachings that we are not to tempt God (Deuteronomy 6:16, Matthew 4:7, Luke 4:12, 1Corithinas 10:9). It is one thing to accidently encounter a poisonous reptile and be saved from death (as Paul was, see Acts 28:3 - 6). It is entirely different, however, to knowingly put ourselves in harm's way with a snake.