Is the King James Bible more
accurate than the NIV?
Submit Bible questions, through our easy to use form,
to our team of mature Christians known as the Email Evangelists.
Question: Even though the New International Version (NIV) may be easier to follow in some instances, is it safe to say that the King James Bible (KJV) is the more accurately translated?
Answer: The King James Bible, so called because it was commissioned by King James I of England (born 1566 A.D., died 1625), was written in 1611 A.D. It is also known as the Authorized or Common version. Forty-seven scholars from the Church of England worked on it. Though four hundred years old, the KJV still remains one of the most popular versions sold. Its Old Testament is based on what is called the Masoretic text, while the New Testament is based on the Textus Receptus. The translation method used is called Formal Equivalence, meaning that the translators attempted to translate the source text they had available, word-for-word, into English.
Many biblical quotations you will read are from the KJV. Some mature Christians have used the KJV Bible for so long and are so familiar with it that they just hate to change.
Many of the best concordances and other helps are based on the King James Version such as Strong's Concordance, Vine's Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words, The Englishman's Hebrew Concordance of Old Testament and The Englishman's Greek Concordance of New Testament. Unfortunately, English has changed so much since 1611 that this version of God's word simply does not mean what it did four hundred years ago.
For example, the KJV uses words and phrases like "afflict your souls" in Leviticus 23:27, "charity" in 1Corinthians 13, "divers" in Matthew 24:7, "iniquity" in Matthew 24:12, "mammon" in Matthew 6:24, "publicans" in Matthew 5:46 and "slept with his fathers" in 2Kings 13:9. In today's language these mean (in order) fasting, spiritual love, different places, lawlessness, riches, tax collectors and being dead.